We came to know about the recent exposure in the defence sector by the Naval Chief. I was trying to find out as to what was the allocation for the port for the container service. I do not know whether he should have made such public statement or not, but that is a different story. I am commenting on it only because it has become public now. He had said that Americans have insisted that they will be given the responsibility of checking our containers. It will be affecting our own sovereignty, and not only in respect of trade. Secondly, if we do not take adequate and early measures, then nuclear weapons can also be smuggled through defective containers, which are there. What about the KYC norms? Nothing happens in the case of Raju and other big names. The UK's Nobel Research Group has said that more than 500 such Indian companies are there who have been found engaged in falsification of accounts, siphoning of funds, insider-trading and violations of all laws of this country. What has the inspector and not the CPI or any the Left Parties who was engaged for the inquriy into the Harshad Mehta case commented? Mr. pal has commented that only 24 per cent of the profit by the Indian corporate sector is shown to the IT. What has happened that they have been making so much of comments about you? As regards the Satyam Case, one Ms. Padmaja had detected diversion of funds and Income-Tax evasion in 2002, and she was transferred. How can they allow a discussion on Satyam to take place? It is because their Chief Minister is involved they have their problem they had the 2002 history both of them have a problem. Therefore, we are just not allowed to discuss Satyam, the largest corporate fraud in this country.  I think that the Government owes it to the nations in such a situation.
